Editorial comment. The terms “invasive” and “non-native” are often treated as being synonymous, but they are not. This is a mistake of this otherwise excellent article. Native species can become invasive as their habitats change. For example, the massive slaughter of the North American wolves by humans led to an explosion of the native deer populations and deforestation. On the other hand, who can argue against the usefulness of the honeybee to the Americas, although it is a non-native species?
As the Earth undergoes climatic changes, the idea of native versus non-native will become quite absurd, as will the idea of “conservation” — as if there is some ideal time we should all be regressing to. But I digress. I’ll deal with this elsewhere.
When a species is being evaluated, the measure should be whether or not it is a good citizen. I, who have spent much of my life being a good citizen outside of my country of birth, take this issue rather personally. Really, the wholesale acceptance of natives and disparagement of non-natives advocated by many conservationists strike me as a sort of ecological fascism.
An invasive species is one that gives little and takes too much — like the super-wealthy 1%, for example, although one hardly sees them because they are well ensconced in their villas and country clubs. Those Central and South Americans who migrate — legally and illegally — to the U.S. and Europe to do nearly all the restaurant cooking, house cleaning, and landscaping for a pittance are more visible than the ultra-rich and easier to attack. Since the poor are helpless, even seemingly harmless rhetorical attacks on them from those in power can serve to announce that it is “open season” on a group. And so when immigrants are senselessly murdered, as happened recently to a group Haitians in the Dominican Republic, I place the blame squarely with the politicians who promote the detention centers and discriminatory legislation.
As is evident from the movements of other species, no one leaves their home casually, and scientists are beginning to warm to the idea of managed relocation and to discover that newcomers can do a service. Human immigrants are usually among the best citizens of any country, and they should be appreciated for their service. Quite a few individuals — humans, birds, butterflies, etc., who are good citizens — have been moving northward and to higher altitudes due to the pressures of climate change. If you should encounter one, help him to settle in or to move on.
Dady Chery, Editor
By Morgan Kelly
SPX via Seed Daily
Wilcove and Pattemore concluded that animals such as the highly destructive ship rat can become an important part of the ecosystem in the absence of native pollinators, many of which perish precisely because of animals such as the highly destructive ship rat.
In an irony of nature, invasive species can become essential to the very ecosystems threatened by their presence, according to a recent discovery that could change how scientists and governments approach the restoration of natural spaces.
Princeton University researchers report this month in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B evidence that destructive, non-native animals that have been deservedly maligned by conservationists the world over can take on important biological roles – such as flower pollination – once held by the species the interlopers helped eliminate.
As a result, campaigns to curb invasive animal populations should include efforts to understand the role of the invasive species in question and, if necessary, reintroduce missing native animals, explained co-author David Wilcove, a Princeton professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and public affairs.
Otherwise, without either native or foreign species to complete crucial tasks such as pollination, plants and animals – particularly already pressured native species – could suffer further, he said.
Wilcove worked with lead author David Pattemore, who received his Ph.D. from Princeton in 2011, to observe the pollination of three indigenous plant species in New Zealand. Initially, the researchers sought to document the plants’ health on New Zealand’s North Island, an environment where native vertebrate pollinator species have largely vanished.
They wanted to compare the plants’ survival to that of the same species in an island nature reserve off the North Island coast where all the native vertebrates still occur. They instead found that invasive pests such as ship rats, introduced to New Zealand by Europeans, were just as instrumental in pollination on the North Island as endemic birds and bats were in the nature preserve.
Wilcove and Pattemore, who is now a scientist at the New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research, concluded that animals such as the highly destructive ship rat can become an important part of the ecosystem in the absence of native pollinators, many of which perish precisely because of animals such as the highly destructive ship rat.
Wilcove describes his and Pattemore’s findings as follows:
“Given the rate at which human activities are driving species to extinction, there is a critically important question about what happens to crucial ecosystem functions such as pollination as the creatures that carry them out disappear. Strangely, it is a question that remains largely unanswered.
“David Pattemore and I found a rare opportunity in New Zealand to address this quandary as it applies to pollination. On the country’s North Island, virtually all of the endemic birds, bats and other vertebrates have disappeared since Europeans arrived, due to habitat destruction and the spread of harmful, invasive species such as ship rats.
“But there is a nature reserve known as Little Barrier Island off the east coast of the North Island where all of the endemic vertebrates still thrive. We were able to directly compare how indigenous plant species fared in an ecosystem nearly devoid of native vertebrate pollinators to how they fared in an environment where those animals still live.
“We observed the pollination of three species of flowering plants in both locations: the Pohutukawa evergreen tree (Metrosideros excelsa); the New Zealand honeysuckle tree (Knightia excelsa); and Veronica macrocarpa, a type of flowering plant.
“On both islands, birds and bats were excluded from some flowers using wire-mesh cages, while other flowers were left open to them, so we could better capture the effect of the pollinators on flower health. We used video cameras to record more than 1,200 hours of footage of the flowers and the animals that visited them night and day.
“As we expected, native vertebrates were indeed critically important for pollinating flowers on Little Barrier Island; flowers that were caged to prevent birds and bats from reaching them showed poor pollination success.
“To our surprise, however, we found a similar result on the North Island. Excluding vertebrates from flowers resulted in reduced pollination success, yet these North Island sites had virtually no native vertebrates.
“We wondered what was pollinating these plants. Our video footage revealed that these plants relied on the activity of the invasive ship rat and the non-native silvereye – a small songbird that colonized New Zealand less than 200 years ago and could not have co-evolved with New Zealand’s endemic plants.
“These foreign species performed some of the same functions as the locally extinct native pollinators and, in the case of the New Zealand honeysuckle and Veronica macrocarpa, the rats and silvereyes provided pollination services as good or better than the endemic vertebrates.
“Ironically, ship rats are believed to be a major cause of the loss of New Zealand’s native vertebrates. So, essentially the killer stepped in to do the job of its victim.
“We believe our results apply to other parts of the world and should cause conservationists and governments to rethink current approaches to containing invasive species.
“Invaders like the ship rat undoubtedly inflict great harm on native species, and there is no question that efforts to control their proliferation must continue. But David Pattemore and I show that these campaigns should now consider the roles these alien species may now play in ecosystems.
“We suggest that efforts to control seemingly harmful pests must go hand-in-hand with efforts to restore missing native species so that important ecological functions are maintained. In the case of North Island, eliminating ship rats without also reintroducing endemic birds and bats could be detrimental to native plants. And if those plants decline, then the other species that depend on them surely will, too.
“In other words, our findings show that eliminating an invasive species for the benefit of native species could actually harm an ecosystem, a surprising dynamic that could frustrate ecosystem restoration efforts.”
This research appeared Nov. 16 in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, and was supported by grants from the High Meadows Foundation, the Todd Foundation, the Auckland Regional Council and Princeton University.
Source: SPX via Seed Daily | Haiti Chery (Editorial comment, addition of bird and butterfly photos)
© Copyright 2011. This material is available for republication as long as reprints include a verbatim copy of the articles in their entirety, respecting their integrity. Reprints of the articles or translations must cite the author(s), the site of original publication, Haiti Chery, and include a “live link” to the article.
More from my site